Complete Gas Shutoff – Terrible! Resumption of Deliveries – Even Terribler.

Uncle Volodya says, “You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.”

Energy can be directed;
I’m turning it up, I’m turning it down…

From “Switchin’ to Glide” by The Kings

“The most dangerous irony is, people are angry with others because of their own incompetence.”

Amit Kalantri, from  Wealth of Words

I came by the reference I want to talk about in this post through a roundabout and somewhat bizarre path. More than a decade ago, a friend implored me to join LinkedIn so that I could add an endorsement to his professional qualifications. I did both, but my LinkedIn account has lain more or less dormant since then. If you’re not familiar with LinkedIn, it has some things in common with Facebook, and they are mostly the reasons I have avoided Facebook. Both send you a non-stop stream of clickbait: “Mark Chapman, you appeared in 4 searches this week!” so that you will be overcome with curiosity as to who could be looking for you, and down the rabbit-hole you go for hours and hours. Both use algorithms and things you have written or read to match you with people who might be acquaintances, and try to get you to build a network of friends and contacts that the program uses to link you to other networks, and so on and so on.

Which is how I keep getting notifications that Edward Lucas has posted something. Yes, that Edward Lucas, the talking spittoon, Estonia’s first digital citizen, fighting cock of the Baltic Republics and noted Russophobe, onetime compiler of birdcage carpeting at The Economist.

The foregoing considered, it will not surprise you, then, that I would be as likely to eat soup made from boiling turnips and Boris Johnson’s bicycle seat as I would be to pay attention to further gobbling from Lucasville. Normally I just alternate between my LinkedIn messages and the ‘delete’ button. This time the message said “Edward Lucas has shared a link”, and although I could not care less if he shared a bathtub with Satan, something in the tagline made me pause: “Edward Lucas, prospective political candidate for….”

You have got to be shitting me. But no! It’s true. Edward Lucas, as addled as a pithed frog, is dipping a toe in the turbulent waters of national politics – as a Liberal Democrat, no less.

Let’s take a look.

“Hello, I’ve finally reached the point of no return. Democracy is in danger. We need to save it.

I’ve tried journalism, writing books, thinktanks, punditry and advising governments. None of it has worked. We are being cheated and lied to at home. Our enemies are menacing abroad.”

Well, he started out far more honestly than most politicians do, although I would suggest he went past the point of no return several stops back. But it can only be a gift for political dissembling that resulted in the phrase “None of it has worked” when the truth would have looked more like “I sucked at all of them”. Perhaps he is destined for politics.

We could probably go on like this for quite some time; it’s been a while since I got going on the subject of Edward Lucas, and I’d forgotten how much I like it. But to tell the truth, I also checked out the post he linked, and it is the subject of today’s discussion.

As you’re all aware, Russia ordered its western gas customers to pay for the commodity in rubles, to Gazprombank in Russia so that the funds would be safe in Russia from western ‘confiscation’ The reason for this was the theft of approximately $300 billion from Russian accounts in western banks, which had served to receive payments by western gas customers. By seizing these funds, western countries announced that they were helping themselves to Russian gas for free, while the blatant theft served as warning that if Russia continued to supply contracted volumes of gas, its western customers would consider it a gift, since payments could be confiscated at any time. The order to pay in rubles, or to make other arrangements for gas deliveries, was effective at the beginning of April this year.

There was a great show of unified resistance, and Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Janša announced huffily that ‘nobody in Europe’ would pay for gas in rubles. That proved to be one of those predictions like “telephones will never be taken seriously as a means of communication” by the President of Western Union in 1876, or the official rejection of The Beatles by Decca Records in 1962: “The Beatles have no future in show business. We don’t like your boys’ sound. Groups are out. Four-piece groups with guitars, particularly, are finished.” Within a month of the directive, nine EU member states had opened ruble accounts with Gazprombank and four of them had already commenced payment in rubles. Poland and Bulgaria vehemently and loudly refused – in Poland’s case, likely because it believes itself a natural leader and that if it hung tough, everybody would follow: I’m afraid it is forever getting that wrong. Poland and Bulgaria had their gas supply cut off, and became dependents of the Union. Just a few days ago, Latvia’s supply was also shut off, making the naughty-corner occupants Poland, Bulgaria, Latvia, Finland, the Netherlands and Denmark, all of whom refused to comply with the ruble-account requirement. Additionally, delivery to Germany’s Shell Energy Europe was terminated. Latvia replied, “So what? Who cares?” and told anyone who would listen that it had already planned to cease all imports of Russian gas as of January 1st, 2023. How they plan to do that must still be a closely-guarded Latvian state secret, since Latvia’s dependency on Russian gas in 2021 was 92%; probably they meant “the EU will give us free gas”. Eastern European countries frequently attribute magical powers to the EU major states which are second only to those of Gandalf.

In mid-July, Russia declared force majeure on its contracted gas supplies, due to the refusal to return a critical gas turbine which had been sent to Canada for scheduled maintenance, whereupon Canada refused to return it, citing sanctions. Gas supply was reduced to 40% of contracted volumes, and after the scheduled maintenance on Nord Stream I was completed, reduced to 20%. Force Majeure is a mechanism employed in “those uncontrollable events (such as war, labor stoppages, or extreme weather) that are not the fault of any party and that make it difficult or impossible to carry out normal business. A company may insert a force majeure clause into a contract to absolve itself from liability in the event it cannot fulfill the terms of a contract (or if attempting to do so will result in loss or damage of goods) for reasons beyond its control.” Russia’s reason for the declaration apparently is that the turbine has still not been returned, although Canada reversed its decision and claimed the turbine had been returned to Germany for shipping onward. Natural-gas prices in Europe have risen 450% year-on-year.

Anyway, that’s background, although necessary background, and brings us to the topic of discussion; Aura Sabadus’s “Russia’s European Gas Endgame May Hurt Even More than a Total Curtailment”. Because Putin is so evil that it would be better to eat grass and sticks and cover your bodies with animal skins, you’ll only have to do it for a decade or so, and then green alternatives will shoot up through the sludge and beckon the way to endless self-renewing free-energy utopia.

I’m sorry about that; there’s just something about the article that makes it difficult for me to talk about it without being sarcastic. Let’s take a look at it, and I promise I’ll try really, really hard. Just before we do, I want to run a quick summary once again, because the author is going to try to convince you that Russia is inherently an unreliable supplier of natural gas, and Ursula von der Leyen is accurate in her caterwauling that Putin is ‘weaponizing’ gas supplies so as to force the EU into prostitution, or something. Russia supplied not a whiff less than the contracted amount throughout its dealings with the EU – including back when they had long-term contracts – except for two occasions, both initiated by Ukraine stealing gas from the pipeline that crossed its territory, and for which transit it was being well-reimbursed. It is worth highlighting here that on those occasions Ukraine was also stealing from the EU by robbing from its supplies, because you would never know it from the vociferous defense of Ukraine’s integrity by EU members. Russia then commenced an ambitious pipeline project – South Stream – which would bypass Ukraine and remove an habitual troublemaker. Washington and Brussels were having none of it; Ukraine’s right to steal from Russia must be protected, and the two leaned on EU member states to refuse crossing rights until Bulgaria’s al dente spine gave way, and that was the end of South Stream. Nord Stream II is another alternative to Ukrainian transit, but Washington doesn’t like it, so that was stopped as well, days after its construction was completed. Europe gets somewhere around 40% of its gas from Russia, and cannot replace that volume through any combination of suppliers. The new gas-transit contract Russia signed with Ukraine, brokered with celebration and relief by Germany and the European Commission of which Von der Leyen is now head, specified minimum volumes of 65 BCm in 2020 and 40 BCm each year thereafter until the end of 2024. The reference was authored by none other than Aura Sabadus, the author of the article we’re going to discuss. Therefore the EU anticipated at the time either that its gas needs were going to be less by 2024 than they were in 2020, or it was going to be able to arrange alternate suppliers. Following the destruction of MH-17, which was clearly not initiated by Russia, the EU nonetheless participated in sanctions against Russia, through which Russia continued to supply gas to countries who declared it an enemy. Since the beginning of Russia’s military operation in Ukraine EU countries have proudly and openly supplied weapons and money to Ukraine, while the UK’s Boris Johnson shuttled back and forth to Ukraine pressuring its president to prevent him from negotiating a peace while Ukraine was in a reasonable negotiating position and still had most of its military. Then there was the incident with the confiscated turbine. What I want to establish here is a substantiated pattern of constant obstruction by the west, making its squealing now about ‘unreliable Russia’ a travesty. All right; ready?

“For more than a year, its state-owned producer, Gazprom, has been reducing supplies to European consumers, helping to lift gas prices to record levels and sparking fears of a looming energy crisis with dire social and political consequences.”

Bzzzzzt!!! Lie. Up until Canada and its string-pullers decided to try a fast play with the turbine, Russia supplied the contracted volume to the letter. Europe wanted more gas, and used the fact that it was not getting as much as it wanted to argue that Russia was stiffing it. Comes to that, so far as I am aware the contract specified minimum annual volumes; there is nothing that prevents Russia from supplying nothing for six months and then doubling its monthly volume for the remaining six months, and although that would not make much sense, it would certainly fuck over the markets worse than Russia is currently blamed for doing.

And because I know it’s going to come up, let’s deal with it now – yes, Russia is raking in the money because of high prices, so much that it is making more money than it would have done by supplying more gas to bring the prices down, and it even has more gas it can sell to India and China while Europe is squealing in pain. So what? Know who else is making record profits? European energy companies. So much so that BoJo’s government – when he was still mismanaging the UK – proposed a ‘windfall tax’, but then exempted ‘power generators’ while oil companies sulked and resolved to dial back their investments.

“Gazprom’s behaviour so far suggests that it is intent on inflicting maximum pain while scoring maximum gain, and the best way to do so is to maintain uncertainty by supplying gas at the lowest possible levels.”

I suppose there are any number of possible interpretations, but I would submit a perfectly reasonable one is “Gazprom’s behaviour so far suggests that it is determined to nip outlaw behavior like Canada’s in the bud; otherwise its options shrink to sending additional turbines for contracted maintenance as they come due and having those confiscated as well, or  operating the equipment past its allowable hours and when it breaks, buy a new one because the warranty has been voided by irresponsible behavior on the part of the operator.”

Besides, what is the purpose of the EU’s sanctions against Russia, if not an expression of intent to inflict maximum pain while scoring maximum gain?

“This creates the impression that Russia is still abiding by its contractual terms but leaves European buyers unable to form a longer-term strategy.”

Ah. So if the contract says ‘pump at least 40 BCm per year’ and Russia does not pump more even though it could, it is ‘creating the impression that it is sticking to the contract’, and it is not Europe’s fault that it brokered a contract which specified 40 BCm even though Europe should have known it would use much more and had no clue where that might be obtained. Because what drives Europe crazy is that Russia’s gas stores are squeaking with strain, they can’t hold any more, and it could easily sell more to Europe and stabilize prices. And in latter years it could always be coaxed to do so, even though Europe always treated Russia like the idiot who you let come out for a beer with you and the guys only because you know you will have someone to make fun of all night long.

Well, things have changed. Russia has written Europe off as a partner, and it’s pretty farcical to see Europe playing the ‘Well, I never; after all I’ve done for you’ card. Europe has long maintained the smug attitude that Russia needs to sell its gas to Europe more than Europe needs to buy gas from Russia. Well, is that true, or not? And if it is, why don’t you just tap one of your many alternative suppliers, instead of shredding your petticoats and watching prices rise? Oh, right; Azerbaijan, I almost forgot. Still run by the Aliev family, whose patriarch and Azerbaijan’s president, Ilham Aliev, was voted Most Corrupt Person Of The Year for 2012 by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP). I still remember Europe’s master plan for the Nabucco pipeline, which was going to bring so much gas to Europe from Azerbaijan’s Shah Deniz field that Europeans could at last tell Russia what they thought of it. There were meetings and more meetings, plans and all the administrative fluff that Europe loves so much that lasted for years of entertainment, but not a meter of the pipeline was ever built. Just as well, too, as the volumes Europe was bragging about getting from it exceeded the capacity of the Shah Deniz field. But Europe is amazingly forgiving with some acquaintances; who does it turn to, when it’s having a problem with Russia that involves juggling energy partnership and being a declared enemy of Russia? Azerbaijan, of course. Good thing the same guy is still president as during the Nabucco years; you won’t have to change your email headers or update your Rolodex. I can’t see what could go wrong, it’s sure to be a big success.

The same selectivity is on show for Sabadus’s contemptuous dismissal of Russia’s ‘excuses’ that its turbine maintenance process is being interfered with.

“Experts said the pipeline could operate without the turbine and that the excuse was just another act of Russian blackmail.

At the same time, the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada urged Ottawa not to return the turbine, while the Ukrainian gas transmission system operator, GTSOU, insisted Gazprom could offset the shortfall by ramping up supplies via its own system, whose shipping capacity is bigger than that of Nord Stream 1.

Despite the pressure, Canada’s minister of natural resources said on 10 July that the turbine would be returned to Germany to support ‘Europe’s ability to access reliable and affordable energy’.”

Of course there are several backup turbines. The trouble with switching out an operating turbine and replacing it with a backup is that now the backup is an operating turbine, and eventually it will come due for maintenance once it passes a predetermined number of operating hours, and then you’ll have to send that one off for maintenance, to a country which has already established a policy of impounding them and not returning them. See where I’m going with this? Eventually you will run out of backups, which are there to support pipeline operations in an emergency. As the old saying goes, lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part, and there is no reason Russia should run down all its system redundancy to support comfort for its enemies. But look at that paragraph again. “…the Ukrainian gas transmission system operator, GTSOU, insisted Gazprom could offset the shortfall by ramping up supplies via its own system, whose shipping capacity is bigger than that of Nord Stream 1.” So Ukraine’s solution was to increase pumping through its own system? On which, coincidentally, it would receive higher transit fees? The same country that already provoked the only two gas shutdowns to Europe, because it was stealing gas from the pipeline? The same operator who earlier declared force majeure as an excuse for shutting down a transfer station and offering to reroute the flow through an interconnector under Ukrainian control?

“Only a month earlier, Gazprom had reduced the transit via Ukraine to 40% of contractual volumes, taking advantage of a decision by the country’s grid operator, GTSOU, to declare force majeure at one of the compressor stations in the east of the country.

The operator stopped the transit via the eastern Sokhranivka entry point amid suspicions that Russian occupants were stealing transit gas, offering instead to reroute the inflows via another interconnector under Ukrainian control. Gazprom not only ignored the proposal but also diminished the amount of gas that was supposed to enter via this point.”

So….a Ukrainian declaration of force majeure is above suspicion…but when Russia invokes it, it’s just a pathetic excuse? The same Naftogaz and GTSOU that welcomed a decision by the German gas regulator to include them in the certification process for Nord Stream II, thus ensuring it will never be certified for operation because to do so will make transit across Ukraine completely redundant? The perceptive will have noted that article is also by Aura Sabadus, and may see a pattern emerging. The Nord Stream II pipeline uses all-Russian turbines in its pumping stations, and would not need to return any to foreign and hostile nations for maintenance. Europe is allegedly desperate for gas. But it will not certify the Nord Stream II pipeline for operation. And Ukraine, Russia’s sworn enemy – or at least the Ukrainian government is – gets a veto? Is it too much of a jump for people to make a connection that Ukraine is preventing any resolution of Europe’s gas problems?

Second-largest U.S. exporter Freeport LNG’s Texas plant continues shut since an explosion in early June and its partial restart is not expected until October, curtailing the U.S. export capacity, even amid buoyant demand in Europe.

Fancy that. Did you see any articles by Aura Sabadus – or anyone else in the west – which suggested the explosion at the USA’s Freeport LNG plant was a little too convenient, and would cynically raise gas prices in Europe? I didn’t.

Here it is, in a nutshell. No matter how Europe turns the histrionics and the hair-pulling up to 12, Russia is not going to make any special efforts to help out a union which seizes its gas revenues until they are placed out of reach, then refuses to entertain any monetary compensation which does not grant it complete freedom to steal further at its whim, which proudly supplies weapons to help Ukraine kill its people, which colludes with its enemy to prevent a peace deal so that the fighting must go on and on, and refuses to certify a completed pipeline which could alleviate all its problems because it prefers that its gas supplies transit a war zone.

“Russia’s political manoeuvring has helped to create so much volatility on markets that it has been impossible to predict price movements from one day to another, let alone to plan for the weeks and months ahead.

Its tactics have so far paid off, but may backfire in the long term if Europe proves brave enough to pull the plug on its addiction to Russian gas.”

If you could do that, you would have done it years ago, and you know it. But go ahead; set up deals with the United States and Azerbaijan for all your future supplies, and really put your heads together and brainstorm about how to make electricity from dandelions and wind. Good luck with that. India and China will be happy to get your previous supplies of gas, and they’ll pay a lot less than you will. Still, you might spare a thought now for what kind of endorsement your behavior is advertising to future suppliers. Because you’re kind of an asshole.

“And I was wondering how to depart without self-loathing or sadness, or with as little as possible, when a kind of immense sigh all around me announced it was not I who was departing, but the flock.”

Samuel Beckett, from “Molloy”

304 thoughts on “Complete Gas Shutoff – Terrible! Resumption of Deliveries – Even Terribler.

  1. Russia Confirms Crimea Sabotage, Putin Security Meeting; Economists Warn Inflation Crisis in Ukraine

    Aug 16, 2022 Russia Confirms Crimea Sabotage, Putin Chairs Security Meeting; Top Economists Warn Inflation Crisis Coming to Ukraine
    News Topic 583

    Alexander Mercouris
    148K subscribers


  2. The Impact of the Russian Invasion on the Ukrainian, Russian, and Global Economies (Revisited)

    Jul 18, 2022 For more on this event, visit:
    For more on the Global Economic Challenges Network, visit:

    For GEC Network’s YouTube Playlist:

    July 18, 2022 | In March 2022, leading economists and regional experts Sergei Guriev and Tymofiy Mylovanov discussed the economic implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, launched on February 24, 2022. Their highly illuminating discussion considered the complexities of supply chains, global food security, the two countries’ economic futures, and more. Four months later, with the economic toll on the world’s economies and the humanitarian cost imposed on Ukraine and the surrounding regions continuing to grow, we reunited these two experts to share their views of the current status of this crisis. Alejandro Werner, founding director of the Georgetown Americas Institute, moderated the conversation.


  3. NATO Expands Into Africa As US Bullies the Continent Over Ukraine, w/ Vijay Prashad

    Aug 12, 2022 NATO expansion might have provoked the war in Ukraine, but surrounding Russia isn’t the organization’s only pursuit. NATO participated in the US “war on terror” in Afghanistan, NATO destroyed Libya and today NATO is expanding into Africa.

    To help break it all down, Rania Khalek was joined by Vijay Prashad, Executive Director of the Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research and author of many books, including “Washington Bullets: A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations.”

    Vijay’s articles discussed in the episode:
    The rise of Nato in Africa
    Africa is on the move

    You can listen to all episodes of Rania Khalek Dispatches anywhere you get podcasts.

    0:00 Intro
    2:00 What is NATO?
    4:50 A global NATO
    7:59 Europe’s military footprint in Africa
    11:00 NATO goes to Africa
    12:10 NATO in Libya: Chaos and consequences
    17:32 Flood of weapons into Libya destabilized Africa
    22:40 New mood growing in Africa
    26:43 Bully Africa over Ukraine
    33:45 Germany becomes third largest military spender
    41:15 Africa is on the move
    49:02 Taiwan
    53:06 Sri Lanka update


  4. RWA interview w/ Gonzalo Lira

    Aug 16, 2022 Support us and get all episodes:

    Or here: https://russianswithattitude.gumroad….
    Gonzalo’s channel:
    Listen us via podcast apps:
    00:00:00 – Life in wartime Ukraine, armed civilians
    00:09:15 – Gonzalo’s biography, racial traits and life motto
    00:24:28 – Red Pill Couch, Tipping & Dating Techniques
    00:34:14 – The birth and death of Trump movement
    00:42:57 – Our debate with Gonzalo! Analytical vs Continental philosophy…
    00:55:00 – Hunter Biden in Ukraine, Borisma holding
    01:05:00 – Ukrainian men and women, quality of life in Kharkov
    01:14:00 – Gonzalo’s philosophical project, Income sources, Saki
    01:27:40 – Q&A, Chateau Heartiste, Manosphere

    Russians With Attitude
    11.1K subscribers


  5. Stalker Zone

    Zaluzhny Pushes Zelensky Out of Power: The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces Kicks Out “Team Ze”
    20 mins ago
    NEW – August 16, 2022

    Got the link from a comment in MoA a few minutes ago:

    Shit Happens!

    Zaluzhny Pushes Zelensky Out of Power: The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces Kicks Out “Team Ze” 8 mins ago
    NEW – August 16, 2022
    Signals of an imminent military coup were sent from Ukraine
    I would not be surprised. Apparently, the fall of the ‘impregnable’ Peski has triggered what looks like a coup in the making.

    Posted by: Barofsky | Aug 16 2022 17:40 utc | 14



    06: 37, 17 August 2022
    The Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Ukraine stated the difficult situation of the Ukrainian army

    The Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Ukraine Zaluzhny ha announced the difficult situation of the Ukrainian army because of Russian artillery.

    Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny stated the difficult situation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front. He wrote about this in his Telegram channel.

    According to him, the Russian army is increasing the intensity of its artillery attacks, and the positions of the Ukrainian military are being hit 700-800 times a day. At the same time, he added,The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation use from 40 to 60 thousand shells daily.

    On 16 August, the Russian Minister of Defence Sergei Shoigu pointed out that the losses of the Armed Forces of the Ukraine and the Ukraine Home Defence forces [similar to the British Territorial Army, amateur and part time soldiers; the Nazis had a similar Volkswehr” , a national defence force of citizens consisting of youths, pensioners and invalids — ME] are huge, but the real figures given by the Kiev leadership are hidden from the public. According to the Minister, the role of Kiev in the Western tactics of warfare “is reduced to the supply of manpower as a consumable material”.


    1. GAZETA.RU

      Ukrainian media has reported on the possible resignation of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Ukraine Zaluzhny
      Zelensky wants to replace Zaluzhny with Syrsky as commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of the Ukraine

      17 August,

      Rumoursc about the possible resignation of Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny are actively spreading in the Ukrainian media. This has drawn the attention of the publication “Strana”.

      The planned personnel changes in particular were reported by the Ukrainian edition of Telegraph, citing its own sources in the Office of the President.

      “The President proposes that Zaluzhny become Minister of Defence and Syrsky (Commander of the Ground Forces) be appointed in his place. But Zaluzhny does not really like this idea. And what to do with Reznikov is also unclear. There were ideas to make him (Reznikov) prime minister, the Americans supported him. He himself was not averse to becoming the Minister of Justice, but Maluska suits the president”, said one of the Telegraph’s sources.

      It is noted that behind the decision to appoint Zaluzhny as Minister of Defence is the desire to remove him from direct influence on the army, since by law the Minister of Defence in Ukraine must be a civilian. Thus, Zaluzhny will have to leave the army if he is appointed to the ministry.

      According to the Telegraph sources, there is no conflict between the president and the commander-in-chief, but there is “a kind of jealousy”.

      “It is not about ratings. Zelensky and Zaluzhny communicate normally, but, as they say, victory must have only one father”, one of the people’s deputies told Telegraph.

      The further fate of Valery Zaluzhny was also written about by the RBC-Ukraine publication, whose source also granted the possibility of a transition from the military to the post of Minister of Defense.

      “Of course, not everyone likes Zaluzhny’s popularity. Sooner or later, this may develop into some kind of decision, but so far there are no conscious and thoughtful plans to transfer him somewhere else. There may be such decisions, but they have not yet matured within the team”, said one of the sources of RBC-Ukraine.

      Earlier, Valery Zaluzhny spoke about the difficult situation amongst the country’s troops.

      The end is nigh?



    Czech Republic predicts “shameful” launch of Nord Stream 2 by Germany
    Czech expert said that Germany could go as far as shamefully launching Nord Stream 2 by winter

    August 17, 2022

    Germany may decide to launch the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline by winter because of the deteriorating situation with gas reserves in the country. This was written by the chief economist of Trinity Bank Lukas Kovanda in an article for the Czech newspaper Lidovky.

    Germany may take this step because of the ongoing drought and a fall in the water level of the Rhine, which is hindering shipping and the supply of coal to German power plants, Kovanda notes.

    “This greatly increases the likelihood that in the autumn or winter Germany will find itself in an even more difficult situation, and it may have to go as far as rationing electrical energy or the shameful launch of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline”, the expert said.

    Possible difficulties for Germany would play into the hands of Russia, he believes.

    According to him, accusations of a sharp increase in electricity prices having been caused by Russia are not true, since, first of all, this had been the result of the “fatal failure” of the promoted energy policy known as “energy transition”.

    The chief economist at Trinity Bank also stressed that this policy had exacerbated Germany’s dependence on gas from Russia.

    Earlier, journalist Nikolaus Blom, in an article for the news journal Der Spiegel, called on the German government to launch Nord Stream 2. According to the observer, the refusal to use this Russian pipeline was causing problems for Berlin, and its launch, on the contrary, would “frustrate Putin’s plans”.

    Putin’s plans, of course, having been to cause a reduction of gas supplies to Europe, thereby bringing about a huge hike in gas prices, resulting in Russia raking in more far money for its exported gas than it did when everything was hunky-dory with Europe, which huge increase in profits the Evil One is spending on financing his long-planned war against dear little, sweet little Banderastan as part of his plan to recover lost territories of the Russian Empire/Soviet Union . . .


    1. Here’s the “Der Spiegel” article referred to above:

      Gas crisis Let’s turn the barbecue over and open Nord Stream 2

      The federal government is keeping one pipeline closed whilst pleading with Putin for more to flow through the other. This is unworthy, contradictory and only useful to the Kremlin.

      Who is really still in favour of opening Nord Stream 2? Gerhard Schröder and Vladimir Putin are, of course. Of course, Chrupalla and his stablemates on the stupid political fringe of the republic: they would most of all like to lick Putin’s boots right now. [The journalist is referring to Tino Chrupalla, Bundestag deputy, member of the AfD Party (Alternative for Germany) —ME] and It’s all pretty transparent and it doesn’t really matter, does it?

      I am afraid not. Namely, what happens if this coming winter is a harsh one and gas eventually runs out and Vladimir Putin says one morning: “Nord Stream 1, unfortunately, is now completely broken, but you can have gas from Nord Stream 2”?


      I’ll tell you what’ll happen: you’ll fucking well freeze, Arschloch, that’s what’ll happen!


      1. And that won’t be the least of it: your industries will collapse, there will be high inflation, prices will rise greatly, there will be food shortages and poverty.

        So I should get your wind turbines a-spinning and the USA “freedom molecules” flowing, if I were you.

        And you can sit around your dried-cow-dung fueled open fires, over which you can get your ersatz coffee fashioned from acorns boiling, as you had to do by the time Germany was totally fucked in Jahr Null 1945.


  8. The latest thoughts of Lucy:


    Arestovich has criticized Ukrainians because of their hatred towards Russians
    17 August, 2022

    Telegram channel “Politics of the Country”

    Aleksey Arestovich, adviser to the head of the office of the President of the Ukraine, has criticized Ukrainians for hating Russians. This was reported in Arestovich’s Telegram channel.

    According to the adviser to the Ukrainian head of state, “the weak choose the simplest solutions”.

    “It’s hard to understand the nuances: it’s easier to hate and deny everyone. This is the solution of a mollusc. Your weakness is the thousands lost at the fronts, internal and external, Belarusians and Russians, from ordinary fighters to specialists and millionaires”, Arestovich wrote.

    According to Arestovich, “the smart solution is to seek allies: the fool repels friends”.

    Interpret that above as you will.


  9. LENTA.Ru

    In Energodar, two employees of the Zaporozhya NPP who had been directing the fire of Ukraine artillery have been detained
    August 17, 2022

    In Energodar, two spotters for the Ukraine artillery who were working at the Zaporozhya Nuclear Power Plant have been detained. This was reported in the Telegram channel of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the region.

    The department said in a statement that the detainees tried to justify themselves by saying that they were not interested in politics. “For international terrorism (aiming artillery at Europe’s largest nuclear power plant – “”) they now face ten years to life,” the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs emphasized.

    Earlier it had become known that Ukrainian troops were striking at the vulnerable points of the plant, in particular, at its cooling system. At the same time, it is emphasized that a malfunction of the latter could turn a nuclear power plant reactor into a “real nuclear bomb”.

    Their hatred of Orcs hath no bounds!

    It’s all because of holodomor, see.


  10. And those saboteurs in the Crimea yesterday were successful because they look like — nay, are indistinguishable from — Orcs, and speak Russian, very likely as a first language, as do Orcs.

    But forget not, looks are deceiving!

    Those saboteurs are Ukrainians, the inheritors of “Kiev Rus’”, pure Slavs who are superior to all other Slavs and lesser breeds, most especially that degenerate, uncivilized, deracinated Tatar-Mongol-Finni-Ugric~Slav creole breed that enslaved the Ukrainian “nation”, stole the historic name of the Ukrainian ancestral homeland as well as their lands, enslaved them and then attempted to eradicate them by orchestrated famine.

    Glory to the Ukraine! To the Heroes— Glory!

    Sieg heil!

    Götterdämmerung here we come!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s