![](https://thenewkremlinstooge.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/image.png?w=562)
“In the end we all come to be cured of our sentiments. Those whom life does not cure, death will. The world is quite ruthless in selecting between the dream and the reality even where we will not.”
Cormac McCarthy, from “All the Pretty Horses”
“I dreamt I was whole once. I flew above the world on wings of snow and sugar and everything was beautiful and I was flawless and perfect.
When I woke my pillow was wet.”
Colubrina, from “Sublimation”
It’s up to each of us, of course, to set and maintain our own social comfort level. But I don’t think I am comfortable with journalism that lies to me all the time, or governments who pull their own stories – upon which they base the formulation of national policy on this or that- from journalistic products which are mostly if not all lies, or to falsely project the state of the world upon statements which are lies. And journalists who uncritically quote those who have an established record of lying are only one step removed from liars themselves – shadow liars, if you will.
I suppose you could just assume everything in the news which is the product of certain journalists will be lies, and safeguard yourself from it by a kind of pre-disbelief. But an unconscious something inside you will wonder if others believe it, and to what extent the bullshit generated is receiving uncritical acceptance – you can’t help yourself.
It’s just possible that some people tell you things they actually believe are true, but they’re not, because the speaker is an idiot – as it happens, I have an excellent example; Hamish de Bretton-Gordon’s “Putin’s nuclear arsenal is crumbling. Ukraine can take it out for good”. I don’t want to get into this concept too deeply, because it’s not the precise journalistic technique I wanted to highlight here. But my God; it simply cries out for someone to challenge its foolishness.
You probably know Hamish de Bretton-Gordon from such warfare classics as “British-made tanks are about to sweep Putin’s conscripts aside”. Here’s a short teaser; that’s all we can afford, because this author’s overconfident swaggering is so prolific that we could easily spend all day and thousands of words creasing ourselves up over his ignorant havering.
“As a former tank commander, I can say one thing for certain: Putin’s demoralised conscripts are utterly unprepared for the shock action now hitting their lines. Ukrainian armoured formations are beginning to meet Russian forces in battle, and they are going to pulverise Russia’s defensive lines. I am confident for one simple reason: Ukraine will follow the Western ideology of manoeuvre warfare in a combined arms context, while the Russians will follow Soviet doctrine, relying on attrition and numbers. The Russians will find that the armour of Western tanks is far more resilient than flesh and bone, they will die in great numbers, and they will lose.”
Dear me; is that what’s been happening? It sure as fuck is not. There are so many things wrong with it, it’s hard to know where to start, but we can start with ‘Putin’s demoralised conscripts’. There is no evidence at all to date which suggests the Russian army in Ukraine is ‘demoralised’, and no conscripts as we know them have been fighting since the early days of the war more than two years ago, when a handful of conscripts were mistakenly sent straight into action. As soon as it was pointed out the error was rectified, and it has never been repeated. Fresh conscripts go straight into progressive training cycles, and the 300,000 ‘call-ups’ were all previous-service military personnel who were recalled because their areas of specialization were needed. Since that time there have been more than enough volunteers to replenish the ranks.
Continue reading “NATO Keeps Rubbing the Lamp, Hoping Victory Will Appear.”